Sixth Amendment Funding Impact
Tracking the constitutional crisis in California public defense funding. County budgets, federal funding at risk, and the growing gap between prosecution and defense resources.
Statewide Funding Gap
Counties in Crisis
Attorney Shortfall
Statewide Funding at a Glance
$1.76B
Combined Defense Budget
State + County + Federal
$2.95B
Adequate Funding Level
Sixth Amendment Center est.
$1.19B
Total Funding Gap
40.3% shortfall
$0.44
Defense-to-DA Ratio
Per $1 prosecution
11
Counties in Crisis
of 24 tracked
400
Avg Caseload / Attorney
Standard: 200
Funding Timeline: 2016 - 2026
A decade of flat funding, rising caseloads, and constitutional erosion.
Proposition 47 (2014) reclassification reducing some felonies to misdemeanors begins showing caseload effects
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.78B
ACLU of Southern California publishes report on LA County PD caseload crisis
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.78B
Sixth Amendment Center releases first comprehensive California indigent defense assessment
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.77B
AB 1412 proposed to create statewide public defense oversight — fails in committee
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.77B
COVID-19 pandemic: courts close, case filings drop 14%, but PD offices face budget cuts of 5-12%
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.60B
Some COVID recovery funding reaches PD offices, but not enough to restore 2019 staffing levels
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.62B
Post-pandemic caseload surge: filings exceed 2019 levels in most counties
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.61B
Governor signs AB 1657 allocating $50M one-time for indigent defense improvement
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.63B
California faces $45B state budget deficit — one-time $50M PD funding not renewed
Stinson v. California expands to state-level class action — potential landmark ruling
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.58B
SB 237 passes: creates California Indigent Defense Commission with $120M annual allocation
Inflation-adjusted (2025 $): $1.68B
Defense vs. Prosecution Spending Gap
The ABA recommends at minimum 1:1 parity. No California county achieves it. Average: $0.44 defense per $1.00 prosecution.
$0.48
System-wide defense per $1 prosecution
$2.31B
Total prosecution budgets (tracked counties)
$1.10B
Total defense budgets (tracked counties)
County Funding Breakdown
Click column headers to sort. Filtered to 24 counties.
| County | Defense Budget | DA Budget | Ratio | Caseload / Atty | Trend | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siskiyou | $1M | $4M | 0.29 | 550 / 200 | crisis | North State |
| Tehama | $2M | $6M | 0.31 | 530 / 200 | crisis | North State |
| Shasta | $5M | $15M | 0.33 | 510 / 200 | crisis | North State |
| Tulare | $11M | $32M | 0.34 | 480 / 200 | crisis | Central Valley |
| Riverside | $52M | $135M | 0.39 | 475 / 200 | crisis | Inland Empire |
| Butte | $6M | $17M | 0.36 | 470 / 200 | crisis | North State |
| San Bernardino | $48M | $128M | 0.38 | 460 / 200 | crisis | Inland Empire |
| Stanislaus | $14M | $38M | 0.36 | 455 / 200 | crisis | Central Valley |
| Kern | $24M | $65M | 0.37 | 450 / 200 | crisis | Central Valley |
| Orange | $82M | $195M | 0.42 | 440 / 200 | crisis | Southern California |
| Humboldt | $4M | $12M | 0.37 | 440 / 200 | crisis | North State |
| San Joaquin | $20M | $52M | 0.38 | 430 / 200 | declining | Central Valley |
| Los Angeles | $318M | $620M | 0.51 | 420 / 200 | declining | Southern California |
| Fresno | $28M | $68M | 0.41 | 410 / 200 | declining | Central Valley |
| Monterey | $13M | $30M | 0.43 | 390 / 200 | declining | Central Coast |
| San Diego | $95M | $210M | 0.45 | 385 / 200 | declining | Southern California |
| Ventura | $26M | $55M | 0.47 | 340 / 200 | stable | Southern California |
| Sacramento | $62M | $130M | 0.48 | 330 / 200 | stable | Sacramento Metro |
| Contra Costa | $42M | $85M | 0.49 | 310 / 200 | stable | San Francisco Bay Area |
| Santa Barbara | $17M | $35M | 0.47 | 305 / 200 | stable | Central Coast |
| Santa Clara | $72M | $145M | 0.50 | 290 / 200 | stable | San Francisco Bay Area |
| Alameda | $68M | $120M | 0.57 | 275 / 200 | stable | San Francisco Bay Area |
| Marin | $15M | $22M | 0.66 | 240 / 200 | increasing | San Francisco Bay Area |
| San Francisco | $78M | $95M | 0.82 | 220 / 200 | increasing | San Francisco Bay Area |
Federal & State Funding Sources
The Sixth Amendment is the only Bill of Rights provision with no dedicated federal funding. These indirect sources are perpetually at risk.
$9M
Active
$33M
At Risk
$3M
Expired / Cut
$370M
Proposed
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne JAG)
At Risk$19M / year
The largest federal criminal justice grant program. California receives approximately $18.5M annually, a portion of which supports public defense infrastructure, training, and technology. Administered through the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). Historically, most Byrne JAG funding goes to law enforcement — public defense receives roughly 8-12% of state allocations.
Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (IOLTA)
At Risk$12M / year
Revenue generated from interest on client trust accounts held by California attorneys. Administered by the State Bar of California. IOLTA funding fluctuates with interest rates — it peaked at $18M in 2007, collapsed to $3M during the zero-interest-rate era (2009-2015), and recovered to $12M as rates rose in 2022-2023. Funds support legal aid organizations that handle some indigent defense overflow.
Title IV-E (Social Security Act — Foster Care/Dependency)
Active$9M / year
Federal reimbursement for legal representation in child welfare dependency cases. When a child is removed from a home, parents have a right to counsel. Title IV-E allows states to claim federal reimbursement for attorney costs in these cases at the Medicaid matching rate (approximately 50% federal share). California has been slow to maximize these claims compared to states like Washington and Indiana.
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) — Court Backlog Funds
Expired / Cut$3M / year
One-time federal COVID recovery funds allocated to state courts to address pandemic backlogs. California received approximately $15M total in 2021-2023, of which roughly $3.2M supported public defense staffing to process backlogged cases. These funds are now fully expended.
SB 237 — California Indigent Defense Reform Act (State)
Proposed$120M / year
Landmark state legislation (signed 2026) creating the California Indigent Defense Commission and authorizing $120M in annual state funding for public defense. This is the first dedicated state funding stream for indigent defense in California history. Funds will be distributed to counties based on caseload, poverty rate, and existing funding levels, with priority given to counties in constitutional crisis.
DOJ Office of Justice Programs — Indigent Defense Technical Assistance
At Risk$2M / year
Federal technical assistance grants for improving indigent defense systems. Supports data collection, workload studies, and quality improvement projects. California has received grants for caseload measurement tools and public defender training programs.
National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) Training Grants
At Risk$950K / year
Pass-through federal grants administered by NLADA for public defender training, leadership development, and trial advocacy programs. Supports the California Public Defenders Association annual training conference and the state's public defender mentorship pipeline.
Proposed: Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Act (Federal)
Proposed$250M / year
Federal legislation introduced in the Senate that would create the first-ever dedicated federal funding stream for indigent defense, distributing $4B nationally based on state caseloads and poverty rates. California's estimated share would be approximately $250M annually. The bill has bipartisan support but has not yet received a committee hearing.
Sixth Amendment Constitutional Metrics
When public defenders carry 2-3x the recommended caseload, the constitutional right to effective counsel becomes a legal fiction.
14
Counties exceeding 2x NAC caseload standards
Attorneys in these counties handle more than 400 mixed cases per year -- double the recommended maximum.
34%
Constructive denial of counsel rate
Cases where representation exists in name only -- the attorney cannot possibly provide effective assistance.
32 min
Avg. time per felony case
Recommended: 180 minutes. Defenders get 18% of needed time.
2.1%
Cases going to trial
94.8% resolved by plea bargain. Overwhelming caseloads eliminate the option of trial for most defendants.
96h
Median hours to first attorney contact
58% of defendants have no attorney contact within 48 hours of arrest.
42%
Meet attorney at arraignment
Meaning 58% of defendants face their first court appearance without having spoken to a lawyer.
47 days
Avg. pretrial detention
Defendants who cannot afford bail and whose overloaded defenders cannot file timely motions sit in jail for weeks.
80%
Defendants who are indigent
1.48M cases per year rely entirely on public defense.
Why This Matters
The Sixth Amendment guarantee of counsel is meaningless without adequate funding. Here is how the crisis affects real people.
Systemic Underfunding
California places the primary financial burden of indigent defense on counties rather than the state. The result is a $1.19B funding gap where a defendant's quality of representation depends on the wealth of the county where they are charged. The state contributes less than 2% of total indigent defense funding -- while states like Colorado and Oregon fund 100%.
Caseload Crisis
The national standard is 200 mixed cases per attorney per year. California defenders average 400 -- nearly double. In the worst counties like Siskiyou, attorneys carry over 500 cases. They spend an average of 32 minutes per felony case when the standard calls for 180. This is not representation -- it is processing.
Career Impact
The statewide public defender vacancy rate has reached 25%. Burnout, low pay relative to prosecution, and impossible caseloads drive experienced attorneys away. California needs 4,450 additional defense attorneys to meet constitutional standards. The pipeline is broken: underfunding creates working conditions so poor that fewer law students choose public defense as a career, deepening the crisis.
How Can You Help?
The Sixth Amendment crisis requires action from every part of the system.
For Defense Workers
Displaced by budget cuts? Our Fast-Track Pipeline provides 48-hour intake and priority matching with offices that need your experience.
Apply for Fast-TrackFor Defense Employers
Access a network of experienced public defenders, investigators, and mitigation specialists ready to serve. Post jobs or request candidates.
Hire TalentFor Advocates
View the full Budget Crisis Tracker with real-time data on county cuts, hiring freezes, and caseload emergencies. Share the data that drives reform.
View Crisis Tracker